Page 246 - Çevre Şehir İklim İngilizce - Sayı 3
P. 246

Evaluation of Surface Runoff Risk in The Frame of Landscape Pattern:
                                The Case of Kastamonu Central District

            et al., 2011; Vaz et al., 2014; Liu, 2017; Sertel et al., 2018; Ozcan et al., 2019; Li
            et al., 2019; Abedini et al.,2020; Wolff and Lakes, 2020; Wolff et al., 2021; Zhang et
            al., 2022; Bao and Yang, 2022).
               Spatial measurements can characterize urban forms. They provide an
            opportunity to evaluate the nature of changes in urban structure by representing
            critical determinants such as shape, configuration and distribution in urban
            landscape  planning  (Forman,  1995;  Milleret  al.,  1998;  Leitão  et  al.,  2006;
            Southworth et al., 2010; Fan and Myint, 2014; Liu and Yang, 2015; Szabó et
            al., 2016; Prastacos et al., 2017). In order to analyze the landscape pattern,
            appropriate landscape metrics should be preferred (Wang and Li, 2021). For
            this reason, landscape metrics in the most suitable class level for the research
            were selected among the “extremely universal and consistent landscape
            structure components” defined by Cushman et al. (2008).
               Fragsats  v.4  software  was  used  to  interpret  the  spatial  arrangement  of
            LU/LC classes of the research area. By means of this software, the metrics
            specified in Table 5 were calculated at the class level (McGarigal et al., 2012).

                       Table 5. Class level landscape metrics used in the research:

              Metric Name         Abbreviation             Description
             Class area            CA (ha)    Total area of the mentioned class
             Percentage of Landscape  PLAND (%)  Percentage of total class area in the entire landscape
             Number of Patches       NP       Number of patches of the mentioned class or landscape
             Patch Density           PD       Number of patches per unit area
                                  (n/100ha)
             The Largest Patch Index  LPI (%)  The percentage of the largest patch in the landscape
             Edge Density            ED       The edge density of a certain type or all types of
                                   (m/ha)     patches
             Landscape Shape Index   LSI      Division of total edge length of the largest aggregat-
                                              ed class by the minimum edge length (as the number
                                              of cell surface)
             Euclidean  Nearest  Neigh-  ENN_AM  Weighted mean of the shortest distance between the
             bor Distance           (m)       target patch and its nearest neighbor belonging to
                                              the same class
             Area - Weighted Mean


             Aggregation Index      AI (%)    The degree of aggregation of patches in the land-
                                              scape



                                                                Year 2 / Issue 3 / January 2023  231
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251