Page 249 - Çevre Şehir İklim İngilizce - Sayı 3
P. 249

Gül Aslı Aksu


               Considering the fact that the areas covered with vegetation are also dense
            in  this  region  (Figure  7)  it  is  seen  that  the  areas  covered  with  vegetation,
            especially forests and shrubs, make an important contribution to reducing the
            risk of surface runoff.
               On the other hand, it is observed that the areas with a lower-medium risk
            are mostly corresponded to agricultural lands and lowlands with relatively
            lower degree of slope (Figures 2, 6 and 7). These areas are also concentrated
            around the main deposits where precipitation waters are collected (Figure
            8). It is understood that the fact that high and sloping areas are covered with
            qualified vegetation makes a great contribution to the holding of precipitation
            waters before acceleration. Otherwise, surface runoff waters from high and
            inclined areas will accumulate at a higher rate in the beds, increasing the risk
            ratio. This situation will trigger the risk that sudden and heavy rains will cause
            floods, especially in the flow direction beds, including the city center.
               Findings of Landscape Pattern Analysis
               The findings of the surface runoff risk analysis performed for the research
            area  showed  that  LU/LC  classes  affect  the  risk  ratio.  At  first,  the  spatial
            distribution of the classes was examined (Figure 9). The class with the highest
            landscape percentage was the “Forest-31000” class with a rate of 51%. The
            “Arable land-21000” (24.68%) class took the second place and the “Shrub
            and/or herbaceous vegetation associations -32000” (12.16%) class ranked as
            third. As can be seen that the areas covered with vegetation have made an
            important contribution to preventing the risk of surface runoff.
























                   Figure 9. The percentage of landscape (PLAND) values of LU/LC classes.






            234 Journal of Environment, Urbanization and Climate
   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254