Page 156 - Çevre Şehir İklim İngilizce - Sayı 1
P. 156

The significance of pastures


            estimates. Tubiello et al (2007) summarizes the responses to climate change
            as follows: (1) nonlinearity and threshold effects as a response to the frequency
            of extreme conditions; (2) altered incidence of pests, diseases, and weeds; (3)
            the farm response to the high CO2 in crops (4) the interaction of climate and
            management variables due to elevated CO2. To reduce the uncertainties in
            the predictions on climate change effects, and assess future risks accurately,
            research on responses of product and pasture types should continue. Wrong
            food and livestock breeding management affects global carbon pool to
            a  great extent  and  may  the  result  in a  security  gap  in  atmospheric  CO2
            concentrations (Ciais et al, 2005; Cox et al, 2004; Tubiello et al, 2007).
               The decrease in the vulnerability of carbon sinks to climate change is essential
            for the sustainability of pastures. Potential changes in carbon cycles depend
            largely on land management practices such as land use planning (pasture
            improvement, forestation, etc.), the use of nitrogen fertilizers, irrigation and
            cultivation. In the last 15 years, a great deal of experiential data has been
            produced. However, this data could not reach the farmers’ land and could not
            be internalized on a regional scale, failing even in the estimates of CO2 levels.
            For models towards responses to CO2 based on land, there is need for further
            collaboration and a bridge between interdisciplinary researchers is necessary
            for compensating for the lack of current data (Tubiello et al, 2007).

               Method and Findings

               The current study investigates the main ongoing conflicts over the pastures
            in Türkiye through literature review and media analysis. This was followed by
            the field studies, on-site observations, semi-structured interviews with local
            administrators and experts (including members of the Provincial Pasture
            Commissions, Chambers of Agriculture, Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture,
            etc.)  And  finally,  the  data  gained  from  all  these  activities  and  the  “Group
            Consensus Workshop” (2018) held in Ege University was evaluated through
            content analysis, a pasture indications set was created.
               The pasture indicators were adapted to the DPSIR causal analysis model
            used in the Environmental Performance Reports (EPR) by the European
            Environment  Agency  (EEA).  DPSIR  causal  analysis  model  provides  quick
            feedbacks in decision-making processes and thus facilitates communication
            (EEA, 1999). At the end of the process, through this model, responses (-R)
            were generated to drivers, pressures, states and impacts (DPSI-) identified in
            pastures (Hazar and Velibeyoğlu, 2019).









                                                                  Year 1 / Issue 1 / Jan 2022   141
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161