Page 31 - Çevre Şehir ve İklim Dergisi - Özel Sayı
P. 31
İrde Çetintürk Gürtepe - Fatih Turan - Fatma Varank
Gough, C., Castells, N., Funtowicz, S., (1998). Integrated assessment: an emerging
methodology for complex issues. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 3, 19–29.
Tuinstra, W., Hordijk, L., Amann, M., (1999). Using computer models in international
negotiations/the case of acidification in Europe. Environment 41, 33–42.
Castells, N., Ravetz, J., (2001). Science and policy in international environmental
agreements: lessons from the European experience on transboundary air pollution.
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1, 405–425.
Eckley, N., (2001). Designing effective assessments: the role of participation, science
and governance, and focus. Environmental Issue Report 26, EEA Copenhagen.
Sundqvist, G., Letell, M., Lidskog, R., (2002). Science and policy in air pollution
abatement strategies. Environmental Science & Policy 5, 147–156.
Lidskog, R., Sundqvist, G., (2004). From consensus to credibility: policy relevant
science in late modernity, innovation: the European. Journal of Social Science
Research 17, 205–226.
Farrell, A.E., VanDeveer, S.D., Jager, J., (2001). Environmental assessments: four
underappreciated elements of design. Global Environmental Change 11, 311–333.
Grünfeld, H., (1999). Creating Favourable Conditions for International Environmental
Change Through Knowledge and Negotiation. Lessons from the Rhine Action
Program and the Second Sulphur Protocol, Implications for Climate Change. Delft
University Press, The Netherlands.
Backstrand, K., (2001). What can nature withstand? Science, politics and discourses
in transboundary air pollution diplomacy. Lund Political Studies 116, Department of
Political Science, Lund University.
Farrell, A.E., Keating, T.J., (2005). Dissent and trust in multilateral assessments’. In:
Farrell, A.E., Ja¨ger, J. (Eds.), Assessments of Regional and Global Environmental
Risks: Designing Processes for the Effective Use of Science in Decision Making. RFF
Press, Washington, DC.
VanDeveer, S., (2005). European politics with a scientific face. Framing, asymmetrical
participation, and capacity in LRTAP. In: Farrell, A.E., Ja¨ger, J. (Eds.), Assessments
of Regional and Global Environmental Risks: Designing Processes for the Effective
Use of Science in Decision making. RFF Press, Washington, DC
Tuinstara, W. (2006). Moving boundaries in transboundary air pollution co-
production of science and policy under the convention on long range transboundary
air pollution Global Environmental Change 16 349–363.
Gürtepe, İ.Ç., Köksal, C.E. (2014). Ulusal hava kirleticileri emisyon envanteri. Hava
Kirliliği Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3: 22-28.
30 Çevre, Şehir ve İklim Dergisi