Page 31 - Çevre Şehir ve İklim Dergisi - Özel Sayı
P. 31

İrde Çetintürk Gürtepe - Fatih Turan - Fatma Varank


                Gough, C., Castells, N., Funtowicz, S., (1998). Integrated assessment: an emerging
                methodology for complex issues. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 3, 19–29.
                Tuinstra, W., Hordijk, L., Amann, M., (1999). Using computer models in international
                negotiations/the case of acidification in Europe. Environment 41, 33–42.
                Castells, N., Ravetz, J., (2001). Science and policy in international environmental
                agreements: lessons from the European experience on transboundary air pollution.
                International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1, 405–425.

                Eckley, N., (2001). Designing effective assessments: the role of participation, science
                and governance, and focus. Environmental Issue Report 26, EEA Copenhagen.

                Sundqvist,  G.,  Letell,  M.,  Lidskog,  R.,  (2002).  Science  and  policy  in  air  pollution
                abatement strategies. Environmental Science & Policy 5, 147–156.

                Lidskog,  R.,  Sundqvist,  G.,  (2004).  From  consensus  to  credibility:  policy  relevant
                science  in  late  modernity,  innovation:  the  European.  Journal  of  Social  Science
                Research 17, 205–226.
                Farrell,  A.E.,  VanDeveer,  S.D.,  Jager,  J.,  (2001).  Environmental  assessments:  four
                underappreciated elements of design. Global Environmental Change 11, 311–333.
                Grünfeld, H., (1999). Creating Favourable Conditions for International Environmental
                Change  Through  Knowledge  and  Negotiation.  Lessons  from  the  Rhine  Action
                Program and the Second Sulphur Protocol, Implications for Climate Change. Delft
                University Press, The Netherlands.
                Backstrand, K., (2001). What can nature withstand? Science, politics and discourses
                in transboundary air pollution diplomacy. Lund Political Studies 116, Department of
                Political Science, Lund University.
                Farrell, A.E., Keating, T.J., (2005). Dissent and trust in multilateral assessments’. In:
                Farrell, A.E., Ja¨ger, J. (Eds.), Assessments of Regional and Global Environmental
                Risks: Designing Processes for the Effective Use of Science in Decision Making. RFF
                Press, Washington, DC.
                VanDeveer, S., (2005). European politics with a scientific face. Framing, asymmetrical
                participation, and capacity in LRTAP. In: Farrell, A.E., Ja¨ger, J. (Eds.), Assessments
                of Regional and Global Environmental Risks: Designing Processes for the Effective
                Use of Science in Decision making. RFF Press, Washington, DC

                Tuinstara,  W.  (2006).  Moving  boundaries  in  transboundary  air  pollution  co-
                production of science and policy under the convention on long range transboundary
                air pollution Global Environmental Change 16 349–363.
                Gürtepe, İ.Ç., Köksal, C.E. (2014). Ulusal hava kirleticileri emisyon envanteri. Hava
                Kirliliği Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3: 22-28.



              30  Çevre, Şehir ve İklim Dergisi
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36