Page 309 - Çevre Şehir İklim İngilizce - Sayı 3

Zeynep Özdemir - Merve Özkaynak

Table 4. Ratio of Green Areas in Neighborhoods According to the Standards
Size Per
Active
Active Green Capita
Region / Neigh- Surface Green
Kısım Population Space
borhood Area (ha) Space
(ha) (m2/
Ratio
person)
1.79
I. Region (Hızırpa- 68 5936 %2.6 3
şa Neighb.) Active Green
Space
PART I: 0.11
II. Region
(İhsaniye Neighb.) 65 2420 %0.2 0.5
Historical Space Active Green
Core Space
1.24
IV. Region
(Sofular Neighb.) 39 349 %3.2 35.5
Space Active Green
Space
1.5
V. Region
PART II: (Bahçeleriçi 56 11539 Active Green %2.7 1.3
Neighb.)
Space
Post-1960
Develop- 0.85
ment Area VI. Region (Ellibe- 78 9756 %1.1 0.9
şevler Neighb.) Active Green
Space
1.29
VII.ve VIII Region 188 24.489 %0.7 0.5
(Şeyhcui Neighb.) Active Green
III. PART III: Space
1.97
IX. Region 117 9559 %1.7 2
(Akbilek Neighb.) Active Green
Post-1990 Space
Develop-
ment Area 0.1
X. Region 97 15612 %0.1 0.06
(Hacılar Neighb.) Active Green
Space
According to the size of green area per capita, Sofular Neighborhood ranks
first, Hızırpaşa Neighborhood as the second, and Akbilek Neighborhood as the
third. According to the size of active green space per person; Hacılar Square
Neighborhood is in the last place, while İhsaniye and Şeyhcui Neighborhoods
ranks in the second last. When looking at the city of Amasya from a bird’s eye
view, inadequacy of green areas within the concrete construction is observed
(Figure 7).

294 Journal of Environment, Urbanization and Climate