Page 88 - Çevre Şehir İklim İngilizce - Sayı 4
P. 88

Smart Cities and Sustainable Urban Regeneration


            technologies  (ICT)  actively  in  process  management.  According  to  Partigöç,
            in this way, it will be possible to achieve the target of Society 5.0, which is a
            human-centered society model living in prosperity. In this respect, technology
            undertakes the role of connector that will ensure “direct interaction between
            people, institutions and urban services” (Dinç, 2020: 23).
               There are many studies describing smart cities and their components. The
            most  cited  and  generally  accepted  classification  among  them  belongs  to
            Giffinger et al. (2007). According to this classification, smart city components
            are:  (1)  smart  people;  (2)  smart  government;  (3)  smart  economy;  (4)  smart
            mobility; (5) smart environment and (6) smart living. A conceptual road map
            has  also  been  developed  with  the  sub-indicators  associated  with  these
            components.  However,  since  no  widely-accepted,  common  and  single
            component analysis and indicator set for smart cities exist, there are many
            different  and  disconnected/independent  studies  that  address  various
            indicators  on  smart  cities/urbanism  and  rank  cities  in  line  with  the  indices
            developed based on these indicators (e.g., Cohen, 2014; European Parliament,
            2014; Giffinger et al., 2007). It is generally seen that the smart city/urbanism
            approach also includes the concept of sustainability. On the other side, the
            assessment of cities only through smart components leads to use of a limited
            perspective  as  a  tool  to  address  cities.  However,  considering  the  current
            situation of cities today, when the sustainability targets set internationally and
            nationally have not been fully achieved yet (see United Nations, 2022), it is
            unrealistic to expect smart components to have been implemented (or being
            implemented) quickly and to make an evaluation based on this expectation.
            Therefore, the studies which present a general overview of cities via the time-
            series data play an important role in showing in which areas cities have made
            progress and in which areas they have stagnated or regressed. One of these
            studies is the Cities in Motion (CIM) city model developed by IESE Business
            School University of Navarra Center for Globalization and Strategy.
               The model is based on four main themes (IESE Business School University of
            Navarra Center for Globalization and Strategy, 2014). These are: (1) sustainable
            ecosystem; (2) innovative activities; (3) fairness among citizens; and (4) connected
            territory. In this context, 10 different dimensions have been described. These
            dimensions are: (1) governance; (2) public management; (3) urban planning;
            (4) technology; (5) environment; (6) international outreach; (7) social cohesion;
            (8) mobility and transportation; (9) human capital; (10) economy. Within the
            scope of this study, different indicators were described for each dimension,
            Cities in Motion Index (CIMI) values   were calculated for the cities included in
            the evaluation on a yearly basis, and the cities were ranked according to these



                                                                 Year 2 / Issue 4 / July 2023  77
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93