Page 66 - Çevre Şehir İklim İngilizce - Sayı 4
P. 66

Urban Transformation Forecasts with Artificial Intelligence
                                        Based Algorithms
               Results Related to the Number of Flats


               The performance statistics obtained for the training, verification and test
            data sets from regression-based classical regression analysis (KRA), MARS and
            TreeNet methods established to estimate the number of flats variable using
            mixed selection data sets are given in Table 2.
               Table 2. Performance statistics of the training, verification and test data sets of
                   regression-based models developed for the number of flats variable

               Training  KRA_Lin   KRA_Üs   KRA_Eks   KRA_Kua    MARS    TreeNet
              RMSE(pcs)   74728     74235     74565     57020    67946    65507

              MAE (pcs)   47777     46577     46969     39392    42630    25786
                NS         0.44      0.45     0.44      0.67      0.54     0.57
              Verification  KRA_Lin  KRA_Üs  KRA_Eks   KRA_Kua   MARS    TreeNet

              RMSE(pcs)   46254     53487     47512     69126    37824    39377
              MAE (pcs)   36579     41567     38250     55432    31454    33492

                NS         0.49      0.32     0.46      -0.14     0.66     0.63
                Test     KRA_Lin   KRA_Üs    KRA_Eks   KRA_Kua   MARS    TreeNet
              RMSE(pcs)   47737     44430     46062     96007    48943    40256
              MAE (pcs)   38703     34161     35286     80720    43746    34778
                NS         0.52      0.59     0.56      -0.93     0.50     0.66
                         Lin: Linear, Üs: Antilogarithm, Ex: Exponential, Kua: Quadratic
               When Table 2 is examined, it is seen that the lowest RMSE and the highest
            NS values for the training data set are obtained from the KRA_Kua model, and
            the lowest MAE value is obtained from the TreeNet model. However, looking
            at the validation and test data sets, it is understood that the performance of
            the KRA_Kua model is poor compared to other models. In addition, taking
            into  account  the  verification  and  test  data  sets  it  is  seen  that  the  highest
            performance for the verification data set is obtained from the MARS method,
            while the highest performance for the test data set is usually obtained from
            the TreeNet method. As a general evaluation, it can be said that the TreeNet
            method gives high accuracy results for all three data sets. In the KRA method,
            it was determined that the model performances of linear, antilogarithm and
            exponential functions are close to each other, and the exponential function is
            the one with the highest accuracy among them. The coefficients of the models
            developed with linear, antilogarithm, exponential and quadratic functions are
            given in Table 3.



                                                                 Year 2 / Issue 4 / July 2023  55
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71