Page 105 - Çevre Şehir İklim İngilizce - Sayı 4
P. 105

Aslı Ulubaş Hamurcu


            regeneration and urban development areas as smart regions, the scope of the
            implementation of these regions has been described, and the criticality level
            of the action has been defined as moderate. Apart from the action no. 26,
            there are 12 actions in total in which a direct relationship between smart cities
            and urban regeneration is established (see Table 4). It has been determined
            that these actions indicate indirect relationships as well as direct relationships.
            It is seen that three of these are of very high critical importance, seven of
            them are of high critical importance, and two of them are of moderate critical
            importance (see Table 4). It has been found as a result of the literature review
            that the relevant actions could not be fully implemented by the target year
            of 2023 (see the Turkish Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate
            Change, 2023). The main reason of failure to achieve the goals set for both
            smart cities and sustainability is the COVID-19 pandemic and the negative
            environmental,  economic  and  socio-cultural  conditions  caused  by  the
            pandemic (see United Nations, 2022).
               When examined in detail, it is seen that the performance indicators defined
            within the scope of the relevant action plan draw a general framework and
            leave the urban regeneration practices for establishing smart cities free and
            flexible.  In  this  context,  it  should  not  be  overlooked  that,  while  preparing
            local-scale  smart  city  strategies  and  action  plans,  it  is  necessary  to  define
            performance indicators dedicated to both the city and neighborhood
            scale. While preparing these indicators, the sustainable urban regeneration
            approach should also be included in the scope and partnerships between
            indicators should be established, considering the relationships described
            under the 2020-2023 NSCSAP. Performance indicator matrix created to help
            establish these partnerships (see Table 5) reveals the relationship between
            the performance indicators and sustainable urban regeneration components
            mentioned in the 2020-2023 NSCSAP and associated with urban regeneration.
            By defining specialized sustainable urban regeneration performance indicators
            for the implementation of smart cities in the context of these relationships,
            the measurement and evaluation of these practices can be facilitated through
            these  indicators.  Some  detailed  thematic  discussions  are  given  below  in
            order to guide the local-scale reflections of the smart city approach in the
            sustainable urban regeneration practices with respect to the preparation of
            relevant performance indicator sets.

               Producing a Common Road Map: Sustainability
               As  can  be  seen,  smart  cities  and  sustainable  urban  regeneration  are
            compatible with one another and mutually inclusive. Among these qualities,
            sustainability is the top common goal, which is also indicated by the current
            national legal and administrative structure. Although the top goal to be achieved



            94  The Journal of Environment, Urban and Climate
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110