Page 191 - Çevre Şehir İklim İngilizce - Sayı 3
P. 191

İbrahim Yenigün-Vildan Balcı-Abdullah Yenigün-Sinan Uyanık


               These structures, which have a message for our time, demonstrate the
            applicability of an aesthetic understanding compatible with nature in many
            areas, from water gauges  serving as pumps to reservoirs,  from maksems
            serving as tanks to taps, regardless of the purpose.

               Protection of Historical Artifacts in the Ottoman’ Water Supply
               Historical artifacts help to provide information about many features of
            ancient civilizations from a social, cultural, and economic point of view.
            Therefore, any trace that goes back to the way of life of historical societies
            is  a  valuable  information  that  needs  to  be  protected.  The  Ottoman  State,
            which was the home of deep-rooted civilizations and embodied a lot of
            historical information due to the different geographical regions it conquered,
            attached great importance to the traces of the past and assigned officials to
            protect the historical artifacts. In this regard, Chief Architect (Mimarbaşı) and
            Imperial Architects (Hassa Mimarları) were responsible for the protection of
            historical artifacts and maintenance and repair of waters. The Chief Architect
            in charge also took part in the supervision of underground water channels,
            ponds  and  sewers  with  the  Water  Superintendents.  The  Chief  Architect
            cooperated with the institutions, including the Water Superintendent and
            the Water Staff Superintendent responsible for the protection of wells, and
            approved  the  construction  projects  necessary  for  the  water  supply.  As  a
            result of the supervision carried out by the Chief Architect, the structures that
            could damage the architectural fabric of the city were not allowed, i.e. no
            permit was issued for them. The approved projects were finally submitted to
            Mayor (Şehremini) for approval, and implemented if deemed appropriate. For
            example, this system was applied in determining the water conduit routes of
            Halkalı and Kırkçeşme in 1847. This project intersected with the foundation
            of the Darülfunun building, one of the most important buildings of the time,
            and it was requested to change the route due to the possibility of damaging
            the structure. Another case was experienced with Hagia Sophia, a historical
            structure that still retains its importance today. As a result of the supervision
            of the Chief Architect, it was requested that the construction of the water
            gauge, which was first allowed to be built around the Hagia Sophia mosque,
            be stopped  as it  may cause moisture  on the walls in  order to  protect the
            historical texture. As a result of these meticulously conducted supervisions,
            the damage that may occur in the architectural texture of Hagia Sophia
            Mosque, which was a great achievement in the conquest of İstanbul by Fatih
            Sultan Mehmet Han and one of the symbolic structures of the conquest,
            was  prevented  (Öztürk,  2007).  As  can  be  seen  from  the  above  examples,
            the  sensitivity  towards  historical  buildings  in  the  Ottoman  state  shows  the
            preservation of the architectural texture of the city and the availability of



            176  Journal of Environment, Urbanization and Climate
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196